Opensignal is the independent global standard for analyzing consumers' connectivity experiences. Our industry reports are the definitive guide to understanding what happens when people use their mobile and broadband connections in their daily life.
Opensignal is the independent global standard for analyzing consumers' connectivity experiences. Our industry reports are the definitive guide to understanding what happens when people use their mobile and broadband connections in their daily life.
The operator wins the new Coverage Experience award as well as the new 5G Coverage Experience award too. For overall coverage, Chunghwa scores 9.3 on a 10-point scale ahead of joint second FarEasTone and Taiwan Mobile that have tied scores of 8-8.1. Chunghwa wins the 5G Coverage Experience award with a score of 6.4.
In the last report, Taiwan Mobile won the Games Experience award outright. Now, FarEasTone and Taiwan Mobile have statistically tied scores of 79.8-80.6 on a 100-point scale.
Chunghwa wins all four speed awards in this report: for overall Download Speed Experience and 5G Download Speed as well as the equivalent upload speed awards. The operator wins by big margins too: on 5G Download Speed it scores 332.2Mbps or over 100Mbps faster than users connecting with second placed FarEasTone (224.3Mbps). Similarly, for overall download speed Chunghwa users enjoyed average speeds of 83.8Mbps, far ahead of runner up FarEasTone which scores 59.4Mbps.
The operator wins Consistent Quality outright. For more demanding applications, Taiwan Mobile scores 85.6% for Consistent Quality, ahead of FarEasTone's score of 82.4%.
The highly competitive Taiwan market is set for major change as there are two separate mergers affecting four of Taiwan's operators in progress. For now, we report all five operators separately. We will report each pair of merged companies as a combined operator only once their merger has been granted all the required regulatory approvals, the deal has formally closed, and the companies switch to operating under a single consumer-facing brand. For now, all of the operators continue to sell mobile services using their existing brands.
In this new Opensignal report, Chunghwa wins more mobile network experience awards outright than any other operator with six wins. The two newly merged groups — FarEasTone/GT and Taiwan Mobile/T Star — will hope that the outcome of their mergers can strengthen their network experience position. We have recently analyzed the pre-merger mobile experience across the soon-to-be-merged operators to help understand the implications on the evolution of Taiwan's mobile experience.
Chunghwa and Taiwan Mobile tie for the Video Experience award with statistically equal scores of 70.9-71 on a 100-point scale. These scores rate as Very Good (68-78) meaning that users are on average able to stream mobile video at 1080p or better with satisfactory loading times and little stalling.
Opensignal’s Video Experience quantifies the quality of video streamed to mobile devices by measuring real-world video streams over an operator's networks. The metric is based on an International Telecommunication Union (ITU) approach, built upon detailed studies which have derived a relationship between technical parameters, including picture quality, video loading time and stall rate, with the perceived video experience as reported by real people. To calculate video experience, we are directly measuring video streams from end-user devices and using this ITU approach to quantify the overall video experience for each operator on a scale from 0 to 100. The videos tested include a mixture of resolutions — including Full HD (FHD) and 4K / Ultra HD (UHD) — and are streamed directly from the world’s largest video content providers.
In addition to Video Experience, we report on the following metrics related to video experience:
The award for the best multiplayer gaming experience is shared across two operators: FarEasTone and Taiwan Mobile with tied scores of 79.8-80.6 on a 100-point scale. Chunghwa with its score of 79.6 points narrowly misses out on sharing the award, as its upper confidence interval does not overlap with Taiwan Mobile's lower confidence interval.
Users on those three operators have a Good (75-85) overall Games Experience which means most users deem the experience to be acceptable. The gameplay experience is generally controllable and the user receives immediate feedback between their actions and the outcomes in the game. Most users do not experience a delay between their actions and the game.
Opensignal’s Games Experience measures how mobile users experience real-time multiplayer mobile gaming on an operator’s network. Measured on a scale of 0-100, it analyzes how our users’ multiplayer mobile gaming experience is affected by mobile network conditions including latency, packet loss and jitter.
Games Experience quantifies the experience when playing real-time multiplayer mobile games on mobile devices connected to servers located around the world. The approach is built on several years of research quantifying the relationship between technical network parameters and the gaming experience as reported by real mobile users. These parameters include latency (round trip time), jitter (variability of latency) and packet loss (the proportion of data packets that never reach their destination). Additionally, it considers multiple genres of multiplayer mobile games to measure the average sensitivity to network conditions. The games tested include some of the most popular real-time multiplayer mobile games (such as Fortnite, Pro Evolution Soccer and Arena of Valor) played around the world.
Calculating Games Experience starts with measuring the end-to-end experience from users’ devices to internet end-points that host real games. The score is then measured on a scale from 0 to 100.
In addition to Games Experience, we report on the following metrics related to games experience:
For voice communications using over-the-top voice apps such as KakaoTalk, LINE or WhatsApp the award is jointly won by FarEasTone and Taiwan Mobile. But their winning scores of 81-81.3 are only slightly ahead of the other operators: Chunghwa with 80.8, while GT and T-Star are statistically tied for last place with scores of 79.5-79.7.
Opensignal's Voice App Experience measures the quality of experience for over-the-top (OTT) voice services — mobile voice apps such as WhatsApp, Skype and Facebook Messenger — using a model derived from the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) approach for quantifying overall voice call quality and a series of calibrated technical parameters. This model characterizes the exact relationship between the technical measurements and perceived call quality. Voice App Experience for each operator is calculated on a scale from 0 to 100.
In addition to Voice App Experience, we report on the following metrics related to voice app experience:
The Download Speed Experience rankings are unchanged from the last Opensignal Taiwan report. Chunghwa retains the award for users' overall average download speeds with a score of 83.8Mbps. FarEasTone is second with a score of 59.4Mbps, and Taiwan Mobile is again third with a score of 51Mbps.
Measured in Mbps, Download Speed Experience represents the typical everyday speeds a user experiences across an operator’s mobile data networks.
In addition to Download Speed Experience, we report on the following metrics related to download speeds:
Chunghwa holds onto the Upload Speed Experience award with a score of 13.4Mbps. The second and third placed operators — FarEasTone and Taiwan Mobile, respectively — are the same as they are in the Download Speed Experience category, but the scores are closer on average upload speeds. Here, FarEasTone scores 12.4Mbps, or just 1Mbps than Chunghwa's winning score, whole Taiwan Mobile is just over one Mbps further behind with a score of 11.3Mbps.
Upload Speed Experience measures the average upload speeds for each operator observed by our users across their mobile data networks. Typically upload speeds are slower than download speeds, as current mobile broadband technologies focus resources on providing the best possible download speed for users consuming content on their devices. As mobile internet trends move away from downloading content to creating content and supporting real-time communications services, upload speeds are becoming more vital and new technologies are emerging that boost upstream capacity.
In addition to Upload Speed Experience, we report on five supporting metrics related to upload speeds:
There is a three way tie in 5G Video Experience with Chunghwa, FarEasTone and Taiwan Mobile having statistically tied scores of 77.2-77.4 points on a 100-point scale. However, the 5G mobile video streaming experience on all five operators places in the same category of Very Good (68-78) meaning users are, on average, able to stream video at 1080p or better with satisfactory loading times and little stalling when connected to 5G.
5G Video Experience quantifies the quality of mobile video experienced by Opensignal users on real-world video streams when they were connected to 5G. The metric is based on an International Telecommunication Union (ITU) approach, built upon detailed studies which have derived a relationship between technical parameters, including picture quality, video loading time and stall rate, with the perceived video experience as reported by real people. To calculate 5G Video Experience, we are directly measuring video streams from end-user devices and using this ITU approach to quantify the video experience observed by our users on each operator’s 5G network on a scale from 0 to 100. The videos tested include a mixture of resolutions — including Full HD (FHD) and 4K / Ultra HD (UHD) — and are streamed directly from the world’s largest video content providers.
FarEasTone shares the 5G Games Experience award with a different operator in this report compared with the last one. Now, Chunghwa jointly wins the award, where in the last report it was Taiwan Mobile that was joint winner. While Taiwan Mobile's score has changed little (84.4 then to 84.9 now), Chunghwa's score has risen much more from 81.7 then to 86.8 now which has enabled it to join FarEasTone as joint best.
5G Games Experience measures how mobile users experience real-time multiplayer mobile gaming on an operator's 5G network. It analyzes how our users’ multiplayer mobile gaming experience was affected by mobile network conditions including latency, packet loss and jitter. 5G Games Experience for each operator is calculated on a scale from 0 to 100.
5G Games Experience quantifies the experience when playing real-time multiplayer mobile games on mobile devices connected to servers located around the world. The approach is built on several years of research quantifying the relationship between technical network parameters and the gaming experience as reported by real mobile users. These parameters include latency (round trip time), jitter (variability of latency) and packet loss (the proportion of data packets that never reach their destination). Additionally, it considers multiple genres of multiplayer mobile games to measure the average sensitivity to network conditions. The games tested include some of the most popular real-time multiplayer mobile games (such as Fortnite, Pro Evolution Soccer and Arena of Valor) played around the world. Calculating 5G Games Experience starts with measuring the end-to-end experience from users’ devices to internet end-points that host real games.
5G Voice App Experience is now jointly won by FarEasTone and T Star with statistically tied scores of 83.6-83.7 on a 100-point scale. In the last report, three operators tied: Chunghwa, FarEasTone and Taiwan Mobile.
5G Voice App Experience quantifies the experience of Opensignal users when using over-the-top voice apps — such as WhatsApp, Skype and Facebook Messenger — on an operator’s 5G network. It uses a model derived from the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) approach for quantifying overall voice call quality and a series of calibrated technical parameters. This model characterizes the exact relationship between the technical measurements and perceived call quality. 5G Voice App Experience for each operator is calculated on a scale from 0 to 100.
With users' average 5G download speeds hitting 332.2Mbps, Chunghwa holds onto the 5G Download Speed award. Second placed FarEasTone has a score more than 100Mbps slower than the winner and is the only other operator to score above the 200Mbps mark.
5G Download Speed shows the average download speed experienced by Opensignal users across an operator’s 5G network. 5G Download Speed for each operator is calculated in Mbps (Megabits per second).
Chunghwa holds onto the 5G Upload Speed award with a score of 40.8Mbps. This speed is over 10Mbps faster than second placed FarEasTone's score of 30.7Mbps.
5G Upload Speed measures the average upload speeds experienced by Opensignal users across an operator’s 5G network. 5G Upload Speed for each operator is calculated in Mbps (Megabits per second).
On a 10-point scale, Chunghwa wins the inaugural Coverage Experience award in the Taiwan Mobile Network Experience report with a score of 9.3. In joint second place, with statistically tied scores of 8-8.1, are FarEasTone and Taiwan Mobile.
The Opensignal Coverage Experience metric measures the extent of mobile networks in the places people live, work and travel. The metric represents the experience users receive as they travel around areas where they would reasonably expect to find coverage.
Traditional coverage metrics typically estimate either a percentage of land area covered, or a percentage of population covered; often neither will be an accurate measurement of the true user expectation and experience. In many markets there are areas where neither population density nor geographic area reflect the importance of coverage to users. For example, in a large mountain range most users will not expect coverage in the wilderness, but poor coverage in the relatively small area of a ski resort is critical for the enjoyment of a holiday. Estimates based purely on population give undue significance to coverage in the most densely populated areas.
Coverage Experience measures geographic coverage of populated areas and therefore more accurately reflects the coverage expectations and experience of typical users. It can give a result that is somewhat different to traditional estimates based on either geographic or population measures. The metric uses a scale from 0 to 10.
The coverage maps show the locations where we received measurements from users connecting with 3G or better mobile service. Each map provides an indication of the areas in which it is possible to obtain mobile service from that mobile operator.
In 5G coverage, Chunghwa triumphs too, as it does in overall Coverage Experience. With 5G the operator scores 6.4 on a 10-point scale. FarEasTone is a clear second with 5.5 ahead of Taiwan Mobile's score of 4.3. GT and T Star bring up the rear with statistically tied scores of 1.8-1.9.
The Opensignal Coverage Experience metric measures the extent of mobile networks in the places people live, work and travel. The metric represents the experience users receive as they travel around areas where they would reasonably expect to find coverage.
Traditional coverage metrics typically estimate either a percentage of land area covered, or a percentage of population covered; often neither will be an accurate measurement of the true user expectation and experience. In many markets there are areas where neither population density nor geographic area reflect the importance of coverage to users. For example, in a large mountain range most users will not expect coverage in the wilderness, but poor coverage in the relatively small area of a ski resort is critical for the enjoyment of a holiday. Estimates based purely on population give undue significance to coverage in the most densely populated areas.
Coverage Experience measures geographic coverage of populated areas and therefore more accurately reflects the coverage expectations and experience of typical users. It can give a result that is somewhat different to traditional estimates based on either geographic or population measures. The metric uses a scale from 0 to 10.
5G Coverage Experience shows the proportion of places Opensignal users with a 5G device and a 5G subscription had an active 5G connection.
The coverage maps show the locations where we received measurements from users connecting with 3G or better mobile service. Each map provides an indication of the areas in which it is possible to obtain mobile service from that mobile operator.
The award for the time users spend connected to a 3G or better network is jointly won by FarEasTone and Taiwan Mobile with identical scores of 99.4%. Chunghwa also scores over 99% with a score of 99.1%.
Our availability metrics are not a measure of a network’s geographical extent. They won’t tell you whether you are likely to get a signal if you plan to visit a remote rural or nearly uninhabited region. Instead, they measure what proportion of time people have a network connection, in the places they most commonly frequent — something often missed by traditional coverage metrics. Looking at when users have a connection rather than where, provides us with a more precise reflection of the true user experience.
We also keep track of the instances that leave mobile users most frustrated: when there is no signal to connect to at all. The most common dead zones users struggle with occur indoors. As most of our availability data is collected indoors (as that’s where users spend most of their time), we’re particularly astute at detecting areas of zero signal.
Our availability metrics take a user-centric, time-based approach that complements the user-centric and geographical-based methodology used by our reach metrics.
Availability shows the proportion of time all Opensignal users on an operator’s network had either a 3G, 4G or 5G connection.
The coverage maps show the locations where we received measurements from users connecting with 3G or better mobile service. Each map provides an indication of the areas in which it is possible to obtain mobile service from that mobile operator.
While GT brings up the rear in 5G Coverage Experience (alongside T Star), our GT users spend the most time with an active 5G connection (40.4%). FarEasTone is second with a still impressive score of 35.8%.
Our availability metrics are not a measure of a network’s geographical extent. They won’t tell you whether you are likely to get a signal if you plan to visit a remote rural or nearly uninhabited region. Instead, they measure what proportion of time people have a network connection, in the places they most commonly frequent — something often missed by traditional coverage metrics. Looking at when users have a connection rather than where, provides us with a more precise reflection of the true user experience.
We also keep track of the instances that leave mobile users most frustrated: when there is no signal to connect to at all. The most common dead zones users struggle with occur indoors. As most of our availability data is collected indoors (as that’s where users spend most of their time), we’re particularly astute at detecting areas of zero signal.
Our availability metrics take a user-centric, time-based approach that complements the user-centric and geographical-based methodology used by our reach metrics.
5G Availability shows the proportion of time Opensignal users with a 5G device and a 5G subscription had an active 5G connection.
The coverage maps show the locations where we received measurements from users connecting with 3G or better mobile service. Each map provides an indication of the areas in which it is possible to obtain mobile service from that mobile operator.
Taiwan Mobile has the most consistent experience looking at the measure for more demanding applications, Consistent Quality. 85.6% of tests using Taiwan Mobile pass the minimum thresholds for these applications, ahead of FarEasTone's score of 82.4% and Chunghwa on 78.9%. However, GT's score is much lower than the other operators, with only 56.4% of tests passing the minimum thresholds.
Consistent Quality measures if the network is sufficient to support common mobile application requirements at a level that is ‘good enough’ for users to maintain (or complete) various typical tasks on their devices.
We combine different experience indicators such as download speed, upload speed, latency, jitter, packet discard, and time to first byte to calculate Consistent Quality. These components are evaluated against thresholds recommended by various more demanding common applications used for a range of common tasks.
To calculate the metric value, the proportion of tests that pass the requirements of Consistent Quality is multiplied by the test success ratio, which is the proportion of completed tests to all tests conducted. Tests that pass indicate that activities such as video calling, uploading an image to social media, or using smart home applications will be possible without noticeable lag or slowdown.
Collecting billions of individual measurements daily from over 100 million devices globally, Opensignal independently analyzes mobile and broadband user experience on every major network operator around the globe.
Opensignal is the leading global provider of independent insights into consumers' connectivity experiences and choice of carrier. Our proprietary insights into mobile and broadband networks give operators the solutions they need to profitably compete and win, from executive level scorecards and public validation to pin-point level engineering analytics and consumer decision dynamics.
Journalists, please retain the Opensignal logo and copyright
(© Opensignal Limited) information when using this image.
This image may not be used for any commercial purpose, including use in advertisements or other promotional content, without prior written consent.
For every metric we calculate statistical confidence intervals indicated on our graphs. When confidence intervals overlap, our measured results are too close to declare a winner. In those cases, we show a statistical draw. For this reason, some metrics have multiple operator winners.
In our bar graphs we represent confidence intervals as boundaries on either sides of graph bars.
In our supporting-metric charts we show confidence intervals as +/- numerical values.
Why confidence intervals are vital in analyzing mobile network experience