Opensignal is the independent global standard for analyzing consumers' connectivity experiences. Our industry reports are the definitive guide to understanding what happens when people use their mobile and broadband connections in their daily life.
Opensignal is the independent global standard for analyzing consumers' connectivity experiences. Our industry reports are the definitive guide to understanding what happens when people use their mobile and broadband connections in their daily life.
Rogers remains in the lead for Consistent Quality and Reliability Experience in Canada. Rogers wins Consistent Quality with a score of 88.7%, representing the share of tests that pass the experience thresholds for most common application tasks. Rogers’ score has increased by more than two percentage points since the previous report. For Reliability Experience, Rogers wins with a score of 709 points on a 100-1000 point scale — more than 10 points ahead of second-placed Bell.
Bell and Rogers share the Video Experience award with statistically tied scores of 76.7-76.8 points on a 100-point scale — a change from the previous report, in which Rogers was the outright winner. Bell’s and Rogers’ scores place them in the Very Good (68-78) category, narrowly missing out on the Excellent (78 or above) category. A Very Good experience means that our users are, on average, able to stream video at 1080p or better with satisfactory loading times and little stalling.
Our Canadian users continue to have the fastest average download speeds on Rogers’ network. Rogers wins the Download Speed award outright again, this time with a score of 198.1Mbps, almost 40Mbps ahead of second-placed Bell and more than 60Mbps ahead of Telus. Bell retains its outright win for Upload Speed, its score of 109.9Mbps over 20% faster than Telus’ 90.2Mbps and almost double Rogers’ score.
Rogers finishes first — either outright or jointly — in 20 of the 28 regional awards. The next most awarded provider is Bell, with eight total wins. Rogers wins all four awards outright in Manitoba and is at least joint first for every metric in Saskatchewan. Additionally, Rogers is first for Download Speed in every region except for Quebec.
Bell is the most awarded provider for Upload Speed, claiming outright victories in three of the four provinces in which it is included — Atlantic Provinces, Ontario and Quebec. Telus and Rogers each lead in two provinces. Additionally, our Canadian Bell users achieve the fastest regional average upload speeds, clocking in at 121Mbps in Quebec.
While Rogers leads for Consistent Quality in the most provinces, winning outright in Alberta, British Columbia, Manitoba and Saskatchewan and sharing the top spot in Atlantic Provinces and Ontario, Eastlink should also be commended for its performance. Eastlink is a joint winner in Atlantic Provinces — alongside Bell — and in Ontario, making it a leader in all both regions in which it is included.
In this report, Opensignal has analyzed the real-world fixed broadband experience of our users across Canada and then separately across seven of its regions. To reflect the varying ways in which fixed broadband is used, we have included five different measures of user experience: Consistent Quality, Download Speed, Upload Speed, Video Experience and Reliability Experience.
For our national award tables, we have only included the providers with comparable scale and extent of geographic coverage: Bell, Rogers (which includes customers of Shaw following the merger in April 2023), Telus and Starlink. In our regional assessment, we have further analyzed the experience of providers that have a significant presence in their selected provinces.
With our overall experience awards, we are assessing the real-world experience of our users measured across all broadband technologies. As a consequence, the mix of plans and speed tiers selected by users for any given ISP will influence its scores. Doing so highlights the extent to which they have been able to migrate their users away from legacy technologies and offer high-speed plans at compelling prices.
Canada is committed to providing ‘high-speed internet’ — defined as 50Mbps download speeds and 10Mbps upload speeds — to all of its citizens, recognizing that the internet is a necessity and essential to participate in the digital economy. Canada’s Connectivity Strategy outlines the government’s plan to address challenges that rural communities have with access to affordable and reliable internet services. The plan aims to bring high-speed internet to even the hardest-to-reach Canadians by 2030 through collaboration and investment, such as the Universal Broadband Fund — a CAD$3.255 billion fund to support internet projects across the country.
The Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC), Canada’s telecommunications and broadcasting regulator, has made a number of decisions intending to increase competition and provide greater choice for consumers. The CRTC recently upheld its decision to allow the country’s largest fixed broadband network providers to offer wholesale access to each other’s networks outside of their core serving regions. However, a final decision is yet to be made. Additionally, the CRTC is making it easier for providers to use Northwestel’s network in the Far North to sell services to customers.
Satellite broadband is an attractive solution to last-mile connectivity, where traditional wireline infrastructure is not viable due to infrastructure costs. Satellite’s lack of terrestrial infrastructure allows it to serve remote populations for the same cost as urban centers. Opensignal’s recent insight compared our users’ experience on Starlink against another cost-effective solution, Fixed Wireless Access (FWA). We found that the two technologies complement each other, with Starlink providing better experience in rural locations. Recent American tariffs have caused Ontario to cancel its CAD$100 million contract with Starlink to deliver internet to 15,000 rural and remote homes. However, the Canadian government clearly recognizes the utility of non-terrestrial-networks (NTNs), with the federal and Quebec governments investing a combined CAD$2.54 billion into Canada-based Telesat’s Low Earth Orbit (LEO) constellation — Telesat Lightspeed.
Broadband Consistent Quality measures how often a network, from the perspective of a single device once connectivity is established, meets the requirements for common applications. Broadband Consistent Quality uses six key performance indicators: download and upload speeds, latency, jitter, packet loss, and time to first byte, setting thresholds appropriate for individual rather than multiple device usage. Metrics represent the percentage of users’ tests meeting these performance thresholds to support activities like watching HD video, completing group video calls, and gaming across all hours of the day.
Measured in Mbps, Broadband Download Speed represents the typical everyday speeds a user experiences across a provider’s network.
Measured in Mbps, Broadband Upload Speed measures the average upload speeds for each internet service provider observed by our users across their fixed networks. Typically, upload speeds are slower than download speeds, but this often depends on the technology used for broadband connections.
Opensignal’s adaptive video experience quantifies the quality of video streamed to mobile devices by measuring real-world video streams over an operator's network. The metric measures users’ adaptive video experience using a Mean Opinion Score (MOS) approach inspired by International Telecommunication Union (ITU) studies which have derived a relationship between technical parameters of adaptive bitrate video streaming and the perceived video experience as reported by real people.
The videos tested are streamed directly from the world’s largest video content providers and include a wide selection of resolutions that dynamically match the network conditions, available bandwidth and device performance. Resolutions range from 144p to 2160p, which is also called 4K or UHD (Ultra High Definition). The model calculates a MOS score on a 0 to 100 scale by evaluating a number of parameters, including: the time to start playing the video, the quality of the video, the time playing each resolution, and the time spent re-buffering.
Opensignal's Broadband Reliability Experience measures the ability of a household to connect to the internet and to successfully complete 'uninterrupted' tasks across multiple devices, encompassing work and recreational activities. While Reliability incorporates and expands upon elements akin to Broadband Consistent Quality, it uniquely includes assessments of initial connectivity and continuous completion of tasks, making it more comprehensive in scenarios involving multiple simultaneous connections.
Collecting billions of individual measurements daily from over 100 million devices globally, Opensignal independently analyzes mobile and broadband user experience on every major network operator around the globe.
Opensignal is the leading global provider of independent insights into consumers' connectivity experiences and choice of carrier. Our proprietary insights into mobile and broadband networks give operators the solutions they need to profitably compete and win, from executive level scorecards and public validation to pin-point level engineering analytics and consumer decision dynamics.
Journalists, please retain the Opensignal logo and copyright
(© Opensignal Limited) information when using this image.
This image may not be used for any commercial purpose, including use in advertisements or other promotional content, without prior written consent.
For every metric we calculate statistical confidence intervals indicated on our graphs. When confidence intervals overlap, our measured results are too close to declare a winner. In those cases, we show a statistical draw. For this reason, some metrics have multiple operator winners.
In our bar graphs we represent confidence intervals as boundaries on either sides of graph bars.
In our supporting-metric charts we show confidence intervals as +/- numerical values.
Why confidence intervals are vital in analyzing mobile network experience