Opensignal is the independent global standard for analyzing consumer mobile experience. Our industry reports are the definitive guide to understanding the true experience consumers receive on wireless networks.
Opensignal is the independent global standard for analyzing consumer mobile experience. Our industry reports are the definitive guide to understanding the true experience consumers receive on wireless networks.
HT and Telemach are joint winners of both overall speed awards — Download Speed Experience and Upload Speed Experience. Telemach forced a statistical tie against the previous winner HT in Download Speed Experience, thanks to an increase in average download speeds of 5.3 Mbps, paired with HT’s decline in its score of 4.1 Mbps. As a result, both operators jointly win with scores in the 52.1-56.3 Mbps range, while A1 trailed behind, with a score of 43.1 Mbps. In Upload Speed Experience, HT and Telemach remain locked in a statistical tie and jointly win this award again, with scores of 12.5-12.8 Mbps.
A1 was the network that met the minimum recommended performance thresholds for HD video, group video conference calls and gaming in 80.9% of users’ tests — which was the highest result in Croatia. This is the second report in a row in which Opensignal has awarded A1 first place for Excellent Consistent Quality and this is its only sole victory in the awards table this time around. Telemach comes second, 1.7 percentage points behind the winner, while HT brings up the rear with a score of 77.3%. Both A1 and Telemach are joint winners for Opensignal’s Core Consistent Quality award as well, for the second time in a row.
In the previous report, A1 and HT were joint winners of Voice App Experience — however, this time around, Telemach overtakes both its competitors and pries the award out of their hands, with a score of 80.4 points on a 100-point scale. This happens due to an increase in Telemach’s score of 1.2 points, while both A1 and HT saw declines in their scores, of two and 2.9 points, respectively. The current winner swapped categories with the previous joint winners and moved up from an Acceptable (74-80) to a Good (80-87) rating. This means that many Telemach users were satisfied but some experienced minor quality impairments. Conversely, both A1 and HT slipped one level down and placed in the Acceptable (74-80) category.
We observed a three-way statistical tie between Croatian operators for 5G Download Speed. Interestingly, A1 won this award outright in the previous report, but due to a major decline in its score of 58.2 Mbps, aligned with HT’s impressive increase of its average 5G download speeds of 56.1 Mbps and the lack of statistically significant change in Telemach’s 5G Download Speed score, all Croatia’s operators are now joint winners of 5G Download Speed, with scores of 216.7-248.7 Mbps. Compared to Download Speed Experience, A1’s saw the greatest uplift in its 5G Download Speed score of five times, followed by HT’s 4.4 times and Telemach’s 4.2 times.
A1 and Telemach were in a statistical tie for 5G Video Experience, with scores of 76.8-78.1 points on a 100-point scale. Both operators placed in the Excellent (75 and above) category, which means fast loading times and almost non-existent stalling. This example shows how significantly 5G services can improve the users’ mobile network experience, as A1 and Telemach placed two categories higher for 5G Video Experience than they did for the overall Video Experience — where they rated as Good (55-65).
In Opensignal's latest Croatia Mobile Network Experience report, we saw a series of statistical ties and joint wins between the three national operators across the awards table. Out of 14 categories, we observed eight two-way statistical ties for first place and four three-way statistical ties between all contenders. Only A1 and Telemach win an award outright each — Excellent Consistent Quality and Voice App Experience, respectively.
On top of its Voice App Experience sole win, Telemach wins 11 awards jointly — with 5G Games Experience and Excellent Consistent Quality being the only ones to elude its grasp. This is a significant step-up compared to the previous report where Telemach won one award outright (Availability) and five jointly. A1 and HT both take home nine awards, but while A1 secures Excellent Consistent Quality outright, HT’s haul consists of joint wins only.
Croatian operators are busy rolling out 5G services in the country. Telemach claims to achieved almost the nationwide 5G coverage, with its 1,200 upgraded base stations, while HT stated that it expanded its 5G footprint to more than 50% Croatians by the end of 2021. Meanwhile, the national regulator HAKOM (Hrvatska regulatorna agencija za mrezne djelatnosti) opened a public consultation on harmonizing the expiry dates of spectrum concessions across multiple bands to October 2024 to allow for a concurrent auction for all bands. The potential auction would cover 800 MHz, 900 MHz, 1800 MHz, 2100 MHz and 2.6 GHz bands, along with the part of the 3.5 GHz band available for regional use.
Opensignal recently published the 5G Global Mobile Network Experience Awards 2022 report, which recognized Croatian operators in several categories. A1 is one of the Global Leaders for 5G Video Experience and 5G Games Experience — and is also a Global High Performer for 5G Download Speed. Telemach is one of the Global Leaders for 5G Availability. All three Croatian operators are recognized as Global High Performers for 5G Upload Speed, while HT received this title for 5G Games Experience and 5G Availability as well as well.
In the same report, HT shines in three Global Rising Stars categories — 5G Games Experience, 5G Download Speed and 5G Upload Speed. Most notably, the operator comes first for 5G Download Speed, with a stunning increase of 104.1%. This means HT more than doubled its 5G download speeds over a year, which was the best improvement in the world in relative terms.
Our results in this report are based on measurements collected across all major mobile operators in Croatia – A1, HT and Telemach – over the period of 90 days between June 1, 2022 and August 29, 2022, to see how they fared.
Opensignal’s Video Experience quantifies the quality of video streamed to mobile devices by measuring real-world video streams over an operator's networks. The metric is based on an International Telecommunication Union (ITU) approach, built upon detailed studies which have derived a relationship between technical parameters, including picture quality, video loading time and stall rate, with the perceived video experience as reported by real people. To calculate video experience, we are directly measuring video streams from end-user devices and using this ITU approach to quantify the overall video experience for each operator on a scale from 0 to 100. The videos tested include a mixture of resolutions — including Full HD (FHD) and 4K / Ultra HD (UHD) — and are streamed directly from the world’s largest video content providers.
In addition to Video Experience, we report on the following metrics related to video experience:
Opensignal’s Games Experience measures how mobile users experience real-time multiplayer mobile gaming on an operator’s network. Measured on a scale of 0-100, it analyzes how our users’ multiplayer mobile gaming experience is affected by mobile network conditions including latency, packet loss and jitter.
Games Experience quantifies the experience when playing real-time multiplayer mobile games on mobile devices connected to servers located around the world. The approach is built on several years of research quantifying the relationship between technical network parameters and the gaming experience as reported by real mobile users. These parameters include latency (round trip time), jitter (variability of latency) and packet loss (the proportion of data packets that never reach their destination). Additionally, it considers multiple genres of multiplayer mobile games to measure the average sensitivity to network conditions. The games tested include some of the most popular real-time multiplayer mobile games (such as Fortnite, Pro Evolution Soccer and Arena of Valor) played around the world.
Calculating Games Experience starts with measuring the end-to-end experience from users’ devices to internet end-points that host real games. The score is then measured on a scale from 0 to 100.
In addition to Games Experience, we report on the following metrics related to games experience:
Opensignal's Voice App Experience measures the quality of experience for over-the-top (OTT) voice services — mobile voice apps such as WhatsApp, Skype and Facebook Messenger — using a model derived from the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) approach for quantifying overall voice call quality and a series of calibrated technical parameters. This model characterizes the exact relationship between the technical measurements and perceived call quality. Voice App Experience for each operator is calculated on a scale from 0 to 100.
In addition to Voice App Experience, we report on the following metrics related to voice app experience:
Measured in Mbps, Download Speed Experience represents the typical everyday speeds a user experiences across an operator’s mobile data networks.
In addition to Download Speed Experience, we report on the following metrics related to download speeds:
Upload Speed Experience measures the average upload speeds for each operator observed by our users across their mobile data networks. Typically upload speeds are slower than download speeds, as current mobile broadband technologies focus resources on providing the best possible download speed for users consuming content on their devices. As mobile internet trends move away from downloading content to creating content and supporting real-time communications services, upload speeds are becoming more vital and new technologies are emerging that boost upstream capacity.
In addition to Upload Speed Experience, we report on five supporting metrics related to upload speeds:
5G Video Experience quantifies the quality of mobile video experienced by Opensignal users on real-world video streams when they were connected to 5G. The metric is based on an International Telecommunication Union (ITU) approach, built upon detailed studies which have derived a relationship between technical parameters, including picture quality, video loading time and stall rate, with the perceived video experience as reported by real people. To calculate 5G Video Experience, we are directly measuring video streams from end-user devices and using this ITU approach to quantify the video experience observed by our users on each operator’s 5G network on a scale from 0 to 100. The videos tested include a mixture of resolutions — including Full HD (FHD) and 4K / Ultra HD (UHD) — and are streamed directly from the world’s largest video content providers.
5G Games Experience measures how mobile users experience real-time multiplayer mobile gaming on an operator's 5G network. It analyzes how our users’ multiplayer mobile gaming experience was affected by mobile network conditions including latency, packet loss and jitter. 5G Games Experience for each operator is calculated on a scale from 0 to 100.
5G Games Experience quantifies the experience when playing real-time multiplayer mobile games on mobile devices connected to servers located around the world. The approach is built on several years of research quantifying the relationship between technical network parameters and the gaming experience as reported by real mobile users. These parameters include latency (round trip time), jitter (variability of latency) and packet loss (the proportion of data packets that never reach their destination). Additionally, it considers multiple genres of multiplayer mobile games to measure the average sensitivity to network conditions. The games tested include some of the most popular real-time multiplayer mobile games (such as Fortnite, Pro Evolution Soccer and Arena of Valor) played around the world. Calculating 5G Games Experience starts with measuring the end-to-end experience from users’ devices to internet end-points that host real games.
5G Voice App Experience quantifies the experience of Opensignal users when using over-the-top voice apps — such as WhatsApp, Skype and Facebook Messenger — on an operator’s 5G network. It uses a model derived from the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) approach for quantifying overall voice call quality and a series of calibrated technical parameters. This model characterizes the exact relationship between the technical measurements and perceived call quality. 5G Voice App Experience for each operator is calculated on a scale from 0 to 100.
5G Download Speed shows the average download speed experienced by Opensignal users across an operator’s 5G network. 5G Download Speed for each operator is calculated in Mbps (Megabits per second).
5G Upload Speed measures the average upload speeds experienced by Opensignal users across an operator’s 5G network. 5G Upload Speed for each operator is calculated in Mbps (Megabits per second).
Our availability metrics are not a measure of a network’s geographical extent. They won’t tell you whether you are likely to get a signal if you plan to visit a remote rural or nearly uninhabited region. Instead, they measure what proportion of time people have a network connection, in the places they most commonly frequent — something often missed by traditional coverage metrics. Looking at when users have a connection rather than where, provides us with a more precise reflection of the true user experience.
We also keep track of the instances that leave mobile users most frustrated: when there is no signal to connect to at all. The most common dead zones users struggle with occur indoors. As most of our availability data is collected indoors (as that’s where users spend most of their time), we’re particularly astute at detecting areas of zero signal.
Our availability metrics take a user-centric, time-based approach that complements the user-centric and geographical-based methodology used by our reach metrics.
Availability shows the proportion of time all Opensignal users on an operator’s network had either a 3G, 4G or 5G connection.
The coverage maps show the locations where we received measurements from users connecting with 3G or better mobile service. Each map provides an indication of the areas in which it is possible to obtain mobile service from that mobile operator.
Our availability metrics are not a measure of a network’s geographical extent. They won’t tell you whether you are likely to get a signal if you plan to visit a remote rural or nearly uninhabited region. Instead, they measure what proportion of time people have a network connection, in the places they most commonly frequent — something often missed by traditional coverage metrics. Looking at when users have a connection rather than where, provides us with a more precise reflection of the true user experience.
We also keep track of the instances that leave mobile users most frustrated: when there is no signal to connect to at all. The most common dead zones users struggle with occur indoors. As most of our availability data is collected indoors (as that’s where users spend most of their time), we’re particularly astute at detecting areas of zero signal.
Our availability metrics take a user-centric, time-based approach that complements the user-centric and geographical-based methodology used by our reach metrics.
5G Availability shows the proportion of time Opensignal users with a 5G device and a 5G subscription had an active 5G connection.
The coverage maps show the locations where we received measurements from users connecting with 3G or better mobile service. Each map provides an indication of the areas in which it is possible to obtain mobile service from that mobile operator.
Consistent Quality measures how often users’ experience on a network was sufficient to support common applications’ requirements. It measures download speed, upload speed, latency, jitter, packet loss, time to first byte and the percentage of tests attempted which did not succeed due to a connectivity issue on either the download or server response component.
Full details on how the Consistent Quality metrics — Excellent Consistent Quality and Core Consistent Quality — are calculated can be found here.
Excellent Consistent Quality is the percentage of users’ tests that met the minimum recommended performance thresholds to watch HD video, complete group video conference calls and play games.
Consistent Quality measures how often users’ experience on a network was sufficient to support common applications’ requirements. It measures download speed, upload speed, latency, jitter, packet loss, time to first byte and the percentage of tests attempted which did not succeed due to a connectivity issue on either the download or server response component.
Full details on how the Consistent Quality metrics — Excellent Consistent Quality and Core Consistent Quality — are calculated can be found here.
Core Consistent Quality is the percentage of users’ tests that met the minimum recommended performance thresholds for lower performance applications including SD video, voice calls and web browsing.
Collecting billions of individual measurements daily from over 100 million devices globally, Opensignal independently analyzes mobile user experience on every major network operator around the globe.
Opensignal is the mobile analytics company committed to improving mobile connectivity across the globe. We are the independent authority for understanding the true experience consumers receive on wireless networks.
Journalists, please retain the Opensignal logo and copyright
(© Opensignal Limited) information when using this image.
This image may not be used for any commercial purpose, including use in advertisements or other promotional content, without prior written consent.
For every metric we calculate statistical confidence intervals indicated on our graphs. When confidence intervals overlap, our measured results are too close to declare a winner. In those cases, we show a statistical draw. For this reason, some metrics have multiple operator winners.
In our bar graphs we represent confidence intervals as boundaries on either sides of graph bars.
In our supporting-metric charts we show confidence intervals as +/- numerical values.
Why confidence intervals are vital in analyzing mobile network experience